Fast, Accurate Water Potential Measurements
Use the WP4C to measure water potential in 5 to 10 minutes. Range: -0.1 to -300 MPa*
The WP4C can be used to measure the water potential of any porous material. It's typically used to analyse soil, soilless substrates, plant material, and seeds, but it has been used to measure a variety of unusual things, including apples, bricks, oil, and insect carapaces.
The WP4C is a benchtop instrument. To measure water potential, you place the sample in a round sample cup (4cm in diameter and 1cm tall) and set the cup in the lexan sample drawer. You slide in the drawer and turn the knob to seal the chamber. After about 5 minutes, the WP4C will beep and show your final water potential reading.
Measurements can be inaccurate if they’re made too soon. When run in Precise Mode, the new WP4C checks to make sure the sample has fully come to equilibrium before displaying a final reading.
The WP4C’s new nickel Teflon sample chamber coating is hydrophobic. Less water absorption in the sample chamber means faster equilibrium.
Finely Tuned Calibration
The WP4C sensor is durable and easy to clean. The instrument can be calibrated using saturated salt solutions (mix your own or order single-sample vials of standards on the accessories tab). New algorithms let you fine-tune calibration for excellent accuracy (±0.05 MPa or better).
The WP4C can be used to measure the water potential of any porous material. It’s typically used to analyse soil, soilless substrates, plant material, and seeds, but it has been used to measure a variety of unusual things, including apples, bricks, oil, and insect carapaces.
The WP4C measures water potential by determining the relative humidity of the air above a sample in a closed chamber (an AOAC-approved method; also conforms to ASTM 6836). Once the sample comes into equilibrium with the vapour in the WP4C’s sealed chamber, the instrument finds relative humidity using the chilled mirror method. This method entails chilling a tiny mirror in the chamber until dew just starts to form on it. At the dewpoint, the WP4C measures both mirror and sample temperature with 0.001°C accuracy. This allows the WP4C to deliver water potential readings with unparalleled accuracy in the -0.1 MPa to -300 MPa range
The WP4C will continue to measure sample water potentials to 0 MPa, but since its accuracy is ±0.05 MPa, readings above -0.05 MPa have errors of 100% or more. -0.1 MPa is usually the the practical limit for good accuracy. At these water potentials, special methods should be used to maximise accuracy. Read about these methods in the WP4C manual.
At high water potentials, the temperature differences between saturated vapour pressure and the vapour pressure inside the sample chamber become vanishingly small. Because of this, the WP4C can now resolve temperatures to a thousandth of a degree. To read water potentials in the wet range (0 to -0.1 MPa), we recommend German manufacturer UMS’s fast response tensiometers and HYPROP moisture release curve instrument.
Note: the WP4C range goes to 0 MPa, but readings of samples wetter than -0.1 MPa will have an increasing, and typically unacceptable, percentage of error. Some users may be able to make useful measurements in samples wetter than -0.1 MPa using special techniques. For more information, see the WP4C User Manual.
WP4C DEW POINT POTENTIAMETER
|ACCURACY RANGE:||±0.05 MPa* from 0 to -5 MPa, 1% from -5 to -300 MPa
-0.1 to -300 MPa*
|MEASUREMENT TIME:||In precise mode:
10-15 minutes for most soil samples
20 minutes for plant tissue samples
In fast mode:<5 minutes (reduced accuracy)
|TEMPERATURE CONTROL:||15 to 40 °C (± 0.2 °C)|
|SENSOR TYPE:||1) Chilled-mirror dewpoint sensor, 2) Infrared temperature sensor|
|OPERATING ENVIRONMENT:||5 to 40 °C (41 to 104 °F)|
|SENSOR TYPE:||Frequency domain with calibrated ceramic discs, thermistor|
|OUTPUT:||RS232 (TTL) with 3.6 volt levels or SDI-12 communication protocol|
|OPERATING ENVIRONMENT:||– 40°C to 50°C|
|SAMPLE CUP CAPACITY:||7 mL recommended (15 mL full)|
|WEIGHT:||3.2 kg (5.2 kg shipping weight)|
|DIMENSIONS:||24.1 x 22.9 x 8.9 cm (9.5 x 9.0 x 3.5 in)|
|CASE MATERIAL:||Powder-painted aluminium|
|DATA COMMUNICATIONS:||RS232A compatible, 8-data bit ASCII code, 9600 baud, no parity, 1 stop bit.|
|POWER:||110 VAC to 220 VAC, 50/60 Hz|
|DISPLAY:||20 x 2 alphanumeric dot-matrix LCD with backlighting|
|INTERFACE CABLE:||Standard RS232 serial cable (included)|
|COMPATIBLE STANDARDS:||ASTM D6836-07|
|WARRANTY:||One year, parts and labour|
Baodi, D., Mengyu, L., Hongbo, S., Quanqi, L., lei, S., Feng, D. and Zhengbin, Z. (2008), Investigation on the relationship between leaf water use efficiency and physiobiochemical traits of winter wheat under rained condition. Colloids and Surfaces B:Biointerfaces. 62:280-287.
Fernholz, M.C. (2008), Evaluation of four sorghum hybrids through the development of sorghum flour tortillas. Kansas State University. 138pp.
Garfield, L.M. and Walker, M.J. (2008), Water potential changes in faecal matter and Escherichia coli survival. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 105:1009-1016.
Hamamoto, S., Tokida, T., Miyazaki, T. and Mizoguchi, M. (2008), Dense gas flow in volcanic ash soil: Effect of pore structure on density-driven flow. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72:480-486.
Moore-Kucera, J. and Dick, R.P. (2008), PLFA profiling of microbial community structure and seasonal shifts in soils of a douglas-fir chronosequence. Microb. Ecol. 55:500-511.
Nardini, A., Ramani, M., Gortan, E. and Salleo, S. (2008a). Vein recovery from embolism occurs under negative pressure in leaves of sunflower (Helianthus annuus).
Physiologia Plantarum. 133:755-764.
Nardini, A., Ramani, M., Gortan, E. and Salleo, S. (2008b). Heterogeneity of gas exchange rates over the leaf surface in tobacco: an effect of hydraulic architecture?
Plant, Cell and Environment. 31:804-812.
American Society for Testing and Materials (2003), Standard Test Methods for Determination of the Soil Water Characteristic Curve for Desorption using a Hanging Column, Pressure Extractor, Chilled Mirror Hygrometer, and/or Centrifuge. Designation D 6836-02. in 2003 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
Anderson, C.E. and Stormont, J.C. (2003), Laboratory Measurement of Soil Moisture at Capillary Potential Greater than 1500 kPa, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington D.C.
Duniway, M.C., Herricka, J.E. and Monger, H.C. (2007), ‘The High Water-Holding Capacity of Petrocalcic Horizons‘, Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 71, pp. 812-819.
Milczarek, M., van Zyl, D., Peng, S. and Rice, R. (2006), Saturated and Unsaturated Hydraulic Properties Characterization at Mine Facilities: Are We Doing It Right?, 7th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, St Louis, MO, USA, American Society of Mining and Reclamation (AMSR). pp. 1273-1286.
Petry, T.M. and Jiang, C.-P. (2004), Final Project Report: Evaluation and Utilization of the WP4 Dewpoint Potentiameter Phase I & II, Decagon Devices.
Sreedeep, S. and Singh, D.N. (2006), ‘Nonlinear Curve-fitting Procedures for Developing Soil-water Characteristic Curves‘, Geotechnical Testing Journal, vol. 29, no. 5.
Thakur, V.K.S., Sreedeep, S. and Singh, D.N. (2006), ‘Laboratory Investigations on Extremely High Suction Measurements for Fine-grained Soils‘, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 565–578.
Wuest, S.B., Lutcher, L.K. (2013). Soil Water Potential Requirement for Germination of Winter Wheat. Soil Science Society of America Journal 77: 279-283.